scrapingbench

You.com for AI agents: benchmark results

You.com (search-index) was tested on scrape and search, not on map and crawl. It got the same tasks, the same model (Claude Haiku 5.5), the same prompt and the same limits as every other provider, and a script checked every answer.

You.com website

Scrape 40 tasks · Test heading and structure preservation on documentation pages, plus package versions and JS fields.

Tasks done
73%
29 of 40
95% interval
56%–89%
Cost per finished task
1.00¢
Median time
3.6 s

9th of 10 on tasks done. You.com finished 23 points fewer tasks than Context.dev, the leader. That gap is big enough to rule out chance.

Answer in the provider's response, no model: what the API returned held every answer on 31 of 40 applicable tasks (78%).

Scrape results, You.com highlighted
ProviderTasks done95% intervalCost per finished taskMedian time
Context.dev38 of 40 (95%)85%–100%1.36¢4.6 s
Spider37 of 40 (93%)81%–100%0.88¢5.7 s
Scrapfly36 of 40 (90%)79%–100%1.17¢6.0 s
String35 of 40 (88%)76%–97%1.33¢3.9 s
Linkup34 of 40 (85%)71%–96%1.23¢4.0 s
Firecrawl32 of 40 (80%)66%–92%1.67¢4.8 s
TinyFish31 of 40 (78%)61%–92%0.71¢4.6 s
Browserbase30 of 40 (75%)60%–89%1.93¢3.6 s
You.com29 of 40 (73%)56%–89%1.00¢3.6 s
Jina Reader6 of 40 (15%)5%–26%4.26¢5.4 s

All scrape results and charts

Other providers